
Research Questions

My current work in Marxist political theory develops a method for reading political thought as a form of historical practice. The guiding aim is to show how political arguments emerge within specific social relations, and how they participate in organising collective life through concepts such as liberty, sovereignty, authority, citizenship, and order.
This project draws on historical materialism and the tradition sometimes associated with Political Marxism, with a particular focus on the social history of political theory developed by Neal Wood and Ellen Meiksins Wood. I use that tradition to clarify how context can be reconstructed without reducing ideas to epiphenomena, and without treating texts as self-contained discourse.
At its centre is a structured way of moving between social conflict, social property relations, and the conceptual languages of political theory. This makes it possible to connect intellectual production to historically specific forms of dependence, power, and struggle while still taking arguments seriously on their own terrain.
This research develops historical materialism as a method for political theory. Rather than approaching political ideas as timeless normative positions or as detached canon debates, it treats them as interventions shaped by historically specific conflicts and institutions.
The study focuses on how political theory registers and reshapes struggles over access to resources, authority, and social reproduction. The key interest lies in the relationship between politically constituted property relations and the kinds of political problems that become visible, urgent, and thinkable within a given social formation.
This research aims to consolidate a clear and usable approach to Marxist political theory grounded in historical specificity.
It rests on several core assumptions:
The project supports a broader programme of work with three directions
Political Scientist & Policy Analyst